Problem: * we seem to have conflicting reviewer opinions on what a good patch is. We should try to consolidate on a single culture for good contributions, as it will confuse new contributors less. * personally would like to formalize that we're starting from the Nova guidelines and moving on from there.
purpose of summit session: * get aggrement on HACKING rules that we want to enforce * figure out what additional rules / collateral / documentation we need to help new contributors onboard * come up with guidelines on what an ideal test looks like * what refactorings we should do early in Havana to get closer to ideal * what good changesets look like (agreement on scope and patch series)
